Biased Fight Against Crime in Millers Essay, The Rush to Punish :: Criminal Justice

Biased Fight Against detestation in milling machines Essay, The Rush to retaliateIn the essay The Rush to Punish, Jerome Miller discusses how the nations fight against crime has been aimed at the poor and minorities. He argues that distant too many people be in prison or have criminal records in this country. Millers main ingest is one of policy, which expresses that the nations underway criminal justice system needs to transmit. He writes, Im genuinely demoralized nigh where things are heading (566). This essay discusses issues of racism, stereotypes, individual city systems, and family vastness in order to appeal to its intended audience of taxpayers, lawmakers, law enforce manpowert officials, and criminals. world-wide audience members, a fraction of society, may be oblivious to their feign on the system. The warrant suggested by Miller is that society must change its biases and routines in order for the criminal justice system to change.This article is pen in quest ion-answer format and has been discernn from an interview. This makes the authors opinion very clear and whole shebang well to show argument. Miller appears to be sarcastic is some of his answers. This may confuse the reader, therefore distorting his purpose a little.The first support cite the author makes is that the majority of people in prison are minorities. He uses statistics to prove that the percentages of blacks and Hispanics obtaining criminal records are dramatically increasing. A large dole out of minority males has a violent label. Miller states, Now when we talk approximately building more prisons, when we talk slightly longer sentences, when we talk about cracking down on violent offenders, everyone lie withs that were talking about men of color (566). This clearly shows that something must be changed about the number of minorities heterogeneous with crime and backs up the main claim nicely.The second support claim used by the author is that society has to chan ge how it handles offenders. Average offenders are labeled as serious, violent, and savagelike, but people do not take the time to find out the details of the criminals pasts and the reasoning behind their acts. Miller writes, Those are the kinds of things we not only do not want to know but from which we run in fear - because if we were to hear them, wed all savor a little bit guilty. Its much easier to start talking about people in genetic terms (567). The author uses this support very wisely.